CRYPTYXThe StudyQuery via MCP →
The StudySun 8 Nov 2026 · 23:59 UTC
WAL

Where does WAL stand?

$0.0269−6.2% 24h−7.3% 7d0 setups firing · history since Mar 2025
›ContextWhere it stands

Price in context

Three years on a log scale.
$0.0338$0.0846$0.2121$0.53142026200d50dprice
Price50-day average200-day average
Key levels
1-year high$0.2343 +770.6%
200-day average$0.0390 +44.8%
50-day average$0.0352 +30.8%
20-day average$0.0321 +19.2%
1-year low$0.0205 −23.9%

Returns against history

Today's trailing return against every trailing return of the same length since Mar 2025.
90-day return92nd percentile
+9.9%
≤ −71.3%≥ +34.3%
180-day return51st percentile
−68.4%
≤ −82.9%≥ −9.5%
365-day return65th percentile
−88.5%
≤ −95.2%≥ −80.2%

WAL vs. comps

Top 5 by 180-day return correlation · ranked by 90-day return
WAL ranks 4th of 6 on 90-day return.
Asset180d corr.30d90d90d pctl (own history)vs 200d MA
SUISUI0.52−23.4%+19.8%66th−4.9%
SOLSOL0.46−21.0%+13.6%61st−3.1%
WIFWIF0.47−28.9%+10.1%64th−15.5%
WALWAL—−22.2%+9.9%92nd−31.0%
DOGEDOGE0.48−19.4%−1.3%61st−19.5%
ADAADA0.51−28.0%−8.5%56th−15.5%
BTCBTCbenchmark0.43−9.6%+16.7%66th+1.9%

Risk profile

From daily closes. Percentiles compare against the asset's own history.
Volatility, 30-day (annualized)
183%
93rd percentile
Below 1-year high
−88.5%
−96.3% from the high since 2025
Max drawdown, last year
−91.3%
Sharpe, trailing year
-1.93
75th percentile
Beta to BTC, 90-day
1.14
correlation 0.34
›The readAcross horizons

Structurally constructive with no short-term stretch.

Structural60–180 days
Constructive
2 high · 2 low of 5 scores
Scorevs own historyown %ilevs market30 days
Price vs 180-day average
High
+1.4σ
8796
90-day return
High
+1.7σ
8493
Trend efficiency, 90-day
Low
−1.6σ
415
Funding, 90-day
Normal
+0.1σ
015
Correlation to BTC, 90-day
Very low
−2.2σ
122
Tactical7–14 days
Neutral
0 high · 1 low of 4 scores
Scorevs own historyown %ilevs market30 days
Price vs 7-day average
Normal
−0.4σ
2778
14-day return
Normal
−0.9σ
1835
Funding, 7-day
Normal
+0.7σ
9074
Taker net buying, 7-day
Low
−1.9σ
53
Entry contextNo short-term stretch: the 7-day return (−7.3%) is in the 33rd percentile of its history.

Compressing or expanding?

Every factor family across horizons. Switch to “Compare” and pick any two horizons to see which are moving away from their baseline — the left columns feed the tactical lens, the right columns the structural.

WAL factor z-scores

7d14d30d60d90d180d365dReturns−0.3σ−0.6σ−0.6σ+0.2σ+0.8σ+0.2σ−0.2σVolatility+0.3σ−0.3σ+2.7σ+2.0σ+1.7σ+0.8σ−0.8σTrend efficiency−0.9σ+1.0σ−0.5σ−1.6σ−1.6σ+0.7σ+0.8σSpot flow−1.3σ−1.2σ−0.4σ+0.4σ+0.7σ+0.6σ−0.2σFutures+0.1σ+0.2σ+0.1σ+0.5σ+0.8σ+0.9σ+0.4σOrder book−0.8σ−0.8σ−0.7σ−0.8σ−0.7σ−0.5σ−0.6σCorrelation to BTC+0.4σ+0.3σ−0.7σ−0.3σ−0.6σ−0.9σ−1.1σ
›Structural lens · 60–180 daysIs the longer trend constructive?
No structural setups are firing today.
›Tactical lens · 7–14 daysIs the short-term move stretched?
No short-horizon setups are firing. The tactical read comes from the scores in “Across horizons”.
›EvidenceWhen this happened before
No setups are firing on WAL today, so there is nothing to look up.
›TriggersWhat would change the read
Every number on this page is live. Ask your agent about any asset, factor or horizon.
Install the MCPPricing
› Methodology

Scores are z-scores against each metric’s trailing 365-day distribution on WAL; “vs market” is the percentile among all covered assets that day. The structural lens reads 60–180 day horizons; the tactical lens 7–14 days. Entry context uses past 7-day moves in the same top or bottom decile on the same side of the 200-day average, at least 20 episodes. Analogs replay every setup over its history; days within 30 days of 2026-11-08 are excluded. Returns are close-to-close at 23:59 UTC.

For information only — not investment advice or a recommendation. Past performance does not guarantee future results.