CRYPTYXThe StudyQuery via MCP →
The StudySun 8 Nov 2026 · 23:59 UTC
LUNC

Where does LUNC stand?

$0.0000−3.7% 24h−8.5% 7d0 setups firing · history since Mar 2021
›ContextWhere it stands

Price in context

Three years on a log scale.
$0.0000$0.0001$0.0001$0.0002202420252026↑↓↑↓↑↓200d50dprice
Price50-day average200-day average50-day crosses the 200-day (↑ above · ↓ below)
Key levels
1-year high$0.0001 +196.3%
200-day average$0.0001 +54.1%
50-day average$0.0000 +24.8%
20-day average$0.0000 +11.2%
1-year low$0.0000 −31.2%

Returns against history

Today's trailing return against every trailing return of the same length since Mar 2021.
90-day return36th percentile
−22.4%
≤ −100.0%≥ +525.8%
180-day return13th percentile
−57.7%
≤ −100.0%≥ +1251.7%
365-day return77th percentile
+2.3%
≤ −100.0%≥ +471.2%

LUNC vs. comps

Top 5 by 180-day return correlation · ranked by 90-day return
LUNC ranks 6th of 6 on 90-day return.
Asset180d corr.30d90d90d pctl (own history)vs 200d MA
SUISUI0.59−23.4%+19.8%66th−4.9%
SOLSOL0.58−21.0%+13.6%61st−3.1%
DOGEDOGE0.58−19.4%−1.3%61st−19.5%
SHIBSHIB0.56−20.3%−3.4%56th−15.0%
ADAADA0.60−28.0%−8.5%56th−15.5%
LUNCLUNC—−24.9%−22.4%36th−35.1%
BTCBTCbenchmark0.54−9.6%+16.7%66th+1.9%

Risk profile

From daily closes. Percentiles compare against the asset's own history.
Volatility, 30-day (annualized)
47%
6th percentile
Below 1-year high
−66.3%
−100.0% from the high since 2021
Max drawdown, last year
−66.3%
Sharpe, trailing year
0.02
79th percentile
Beta to BTC, 90-day
0.97
correlation 0.70
›The readAcross horizons

No clear structural trend and no short-term stretch.

Structural60–180 days
Neutral
1 high · 1 low of 5 scores
Scorevs own historyown %ilevs market30 days
Price vs 180-day average
Normal
−0.9σ
86
90-day return
Normal
−0.6σ
246
Trend efficiency, 90-day
Normal
+0.3σ
6890
Funding, 90-day
Low
−1.1σ
276
Correlation to BTC, 90-day
High
+1.3σ
10092
Tactical7–14 days
Neutral
0 high · 0 low of 4 scores
Scorevs own historyown %ilevs market30 days
Price vs 7-day average
Normal
−0.5σ
1772
14-day return
Normal
−0.6σ
2268
Funding, 7-day
Normal
+0.3σ
6034
Taker net buying, 7-day
Normal
−0.2σ
1833
Entry contextNo short-term stretch: the 7-day return (−8.5%) is in the 24th percentile of its history.

Compressing or expanding?

Every factor family across horizons. Switch to “Compare” and pick any two horizons to see which are moving away from their baseline — the left columns feed the tactical lens, the right columns the structural.

LUNC factor z-scores

7d14d30d60d90d180d365dReturns−0.4σ−0.4σ−0.6σ−0.4σ−0.4σ−1.1σ−0.2σVolatility−0.4σ−0.5σ−0.8σ−1.2σ−1.3σ−2.4σ+0.1σTrend efficiency−0.6σ+0.9σ+1.9σ+0.6σ+0.3σ+1.9σ−1.0σSpot flow−0.4σ−0.3σ−0.3σ−0.3σ−0.3σ−0.3σ+0.2σFutures−0.5σ−0.5σ−0.4σ−0.8σ−0.3σ+0.4σ−1.0σOrder book−0.6σ−1.1σ−0.7σ−0.5σ−0.6σ−0.7σ−0.4σCorrelation to BTC+0.6σ+0.6σ+0.5σ+0.4σ+0.5σ+0.5σ−0.5σ
›Structural lens · 60–180 daysIs the longer trend constructive?
No structural setups are firing today.
›Tactical lens · 7–14 daysIs the short-term move stretched?
No short-horizon setups are firing. The tactical read comes from the scores in “Across horizons”.
›EvidenceWhen this happened before
No setups are firing on LUNC today, so there is nothing to look up.
›TriggersWhat would change the read
Every number on this page is live. Ask your agent about any asset, factor or horizon.
Install the MCPPricing
› Methodology

Scores are z-scores against each metric’s trailing 365-day distribution on LUNC; “vs market” is the percentile among all covered assets that day. The structural lens reads 60–180 day horizons; the tactical lens 7–14 days. Entry context uses past 7-day moves in the same top or bottom decile on the same side of the 200-day average, at least 20 episodes. Analogs replay every setup over its history; days within 30 days of 2026-11-08 are excluded. Returns are close-to-close at 23:59 UTC.

For information only — not investment advice or a recommendation. Past performance does not guarantee future results.