CRYPTYXThe StudyQuery via MCP →
The StudySun 8 Nov 2026 · 23:59 UTC
BEAM

Where does BEAM stand?

$0.0040+2.0% 24h−26.6% 7d0 setups firing · history since Oct 2023
›ContextWhere it stands

Price in context

Three years on a log scale.
$0.0021$0.0051$0.0126$0.0311202420252026↓↑↓↑↓↑price50d200d
Price50-day average200-day average50-day crosses the 200-day (↑ above · ↓ below)
Key levels
1-year high$0.0055 +36.2%
20-day average$0.0038 −4.9%
50-day average$0.0030 −26.1%
200-day average$0.0019 −51.9%
1-year low$0.0013 −68.4%

Returns against history

Today's trailing return against every trailing return of the same length since Oct 2023.
90-day return96th percentile
+196.2%
≤ −79.9%≥ +281.0%
180-day return95th percentile
+101.8%
≤ −81.9%≥ +407.6%
365-day return86th percentile
−8.0%
≤ −90.8%≥ +244.4%

BEAM vs. comps

Top 5 by 180-day return correlation · ranked by 90-day return
BEAM ranks 1st of 6 on 90-day return.
Asset180d corr.30d90d90d pctl (own history)vs 200d MA
BEAMBEAM—+51.0%+196.2%96th+107.8%
PEPEPEPE0.46+24.8%+71.7%79th+40.2%
LINKLINK0.47−18.9%+25.3%76th+3.0%
SOLSOL0.45−21.0%+13.6%61st−3.1%
OPOP0.48−26.8%+6.3%68th−13.0%
SHIBSHIB0.45−20.3%−3.4%56th−15.0%
BTCBTCbenchmark0.41−9.6%+16.7%66th+1.9%

Risk profile

From daily closes. Percentiles compare against the asset's own history.
Volatility, 30-day (annualized)
177%
99th percentile
Below 1-year high
−26.6%
−90.5% from the high since 2023
Max drawdown, last year
−72.1%
Sharpe, trailing year
-0.12
88th percentile
Beta to BTC, 90-day
1.24
correlation 0.39
›The readAcross horizons

Structurally constructive, tactically stretched: the longer trend is intact, but the short-term move is extended.

Structural60–180 days
Constructive
3 high · 2 low of 5 scores
Scorevs own historyown %ilevs market30 days
Price vs 180-day average
Very high
+3.1σ
9099
90-day return
Very high
+3.8σ
9499
Trend efficiency, 90-day
High
+1.2σ
8696
Funding, 90-day
Low
−1.8σ
04
Correlation to BTC, 90-day
Very low
−2.0σ
234
Tactical7–14 days
Stretched
1 high · 1 low of 3 scores
Scorevs own historyown %ilevs market30 days
Price vs 7-day average
Normal
−0.5σ
1869
14-day return
Very high
+2.1σ
9399
Funding, 7-day
Low
−1.1σ
105
Entry contextToo few comparable short-term stretches in BEAM's history to say what followed (needs 20).

Compressing or expanding?

Every factor family across horizons. Switch to “Compare” and pick any two horizons to see which are moving away from their baseline — the left columns feed the tactical lens, the right columns the structural.

BEAM factor z-scores

7d14d30d60d90d180d365dReturns−0.5σ+0.1σ+0.7σ+1.6σ+2.2σ+2.2σ+2.2σVolatility+1.9σ+4.1σ+3.7σ+2.5σ+2.4σ+1.1σ−0.6σTrend efficiency−0.6σ−0.7σ−0.1σ+1.0σ+1.2σ+0.3σ−2.1σSpot flow−0.7σ−0.8σ−0.3σ+0.0σ+0.1σ+0.5σ+2.5σFutures−0.5σ−1.2σ−1.9σ−0.6σ+0.1σ+0.1σ−1.4σOrder book+0.0σ−0.1σ−0.1σ−0.3σ−0.5σ−0.5σ−0.9σCorrelation to BTC−0.4σ+0.0σ−0.1σ−0.5σ−0.6σ−1.0σ−1.8σ
›Structural lens · 60–180 daysIs the longer trend constructive?
No structural setups are firing today.
›Tactical lens · 7–14 daysIs the short-term move stretched?
No short-horizon setups are firing. The tactical read comes from the scores in “Across horizons”.
›EvidenceWhen this happened before
No setups are firing on BEAM today, so there is nothing to look up.
›TriggersWhat would change the read
Every number on this page is live. Ask your agent about any asset, factor or horizon.
Install the MCPPricing
› Methodology

Scores are z-scores against each metric’s trailing 365-day distribution on BEAM; “vs market” is the percentile among all covered assets that day. The structural lens reads 60–180 day horizons; the tactical lens 7–14 days. Entry context uses past 7-day moves in the same top or bottom decile on the same side of the 200-day average, at least 20 episodes. Analogs replay every setup over its history; days within 30 days of 2026-11-08 are excluded. Returns are close-to-close at 23:59 UTC.

For information only — not investment advice or a recommendation. Past performance does not guarantee future results.